"Earth as a Simulation Series 3: 'IF' we are living in a Simulation, how would Simulated 'COPIED' People+Environmental Components be 'CHECKED' for both Accuracy & Anomalies? Is it possible to DIRECTLY access the pre-defined SCRIPTED data files of 'Testing & Checking' Experiences to Accumulate Evidence of VR Experiences & DETAILS of the Simulation Projects Working & VR 'TEST' Environments? This Series Presents Articles & Exercises Exploring these Possibilities. 'UPDATE', to all questions posed here, the answer is 'YES'!!!"
Main Page Headings List
- How to make sure that Simulated Copied People are Simulated VERY Accurately as Copies!!!
- Making Sure that Simulated Copied People Don't Become Aware they are Simulated Copied People
- Preventing Simulated Copied People From Accessing The TESTING of THEMSELVES as being 'Accurate' Simulated Copies of Someone ELSE
- 'Simulation' Exploration Exercises Introduction Common to ALL Simulation Targeting 'Exercise' Pages . . .
- Accessing VR Networks & High Technology Originated & Facilitated Experiences Directly
- The Simulation Software 'Obviously' WON'T LIKE People Accessing these Experiences
- 4. Engaging with Specific Details of ANY Copied People Simulation Project VR Accuracy Checking Experiences
Initially the title and the ‘focus’ of this exercise was: Engaging with Specific Details of My EAAS Project Department VR Work Experiences and the first versions of this exercise was written to engage with EAAS project VR experiences. As part of this and because I’ve a lot of comments on previous ‘exercise’ pages indicating that pretty much everyone working on the EAAS project spent time checking the accuracy of all different combinations of ‘everything’ that would be presented in the final finished ‘simulation’ version then I was trying to THINK of what different people be ‘checking’ out so that I could include these possibilities in the exercise.
How to make sure that Simulated Copied People are Simulated VERY Accurately as Copies!!!
So, for this ‘exercise’ I was specifically trying to think of and become aware of the range and scale of experiences that those working on this project would have as part of ‘testing and checking’ the accuracy and ‘integrity’ of the simulation software as it was at any particular point in time. However, as I have already mentioned in a comment this proved extremely difficult, the management applied to myself while trying to write this exercise was immense. I was basically being very strongly prevented from thinking about ‘simulation, copied people, copied reality’ basics.
Basically, if you are putting together a ‘serious’ simulation then you will want to have absolutely everything or as much as possible of ‘everything’ in your simulation matching up as accurately as possible with the original environment / environments and more importantly you will want to have each simulated person living out an accurate copy of the life of the person they are simulating.
In you HAVING TO HAVE each person living out the life of someone else ‘accurately’ then the most important thing to CHECK FOR (for each simulated person) is that they ARE ‘ACCURATELY’ LIVING OUT the life of the person they are simulating AND this will be particularly checked for important, defining events, circumstances and particularly those involving interactions with others. If these ‘defining’ time points are not done absolutely properly for individuals then such ‘errors’ in causing specific people to be living more and more ‘off script’ which may result in an ‘off script’ cascade and that would push or pull others ‘off their script’ too. Because of this then a great deal of efforts will be expended to ensure that the simulation software is good enough to ‘manage’ people to basically force them to live out a pre-determined life while ALSO, ensuring that this is done with enough ‘finesse / nuance’ to prevent the simulated person from becoming suspicious that THEY ARE LIVING OUT A FIXED PRE-DETERMINED LIFE.
So, as the above is very important then it was likely a condition of those working on such a project that they themselves will be required to merge with and check the accuracy of the simulated experiences of a ‘TEST’ version of themselves and particularly as this version of themselves is being simulated as accurately as possible living through likely many ‘important and or defining’ events, circumstances and or meetings with others that are part of your own past history.
As it is IMPERATIVE that people don’t realise that they are simulated copies of someone else living out someone else’s life then the simulations ‘keep the simulation safe from discovery’ management software would be written to absolutely prevent any copied person in the simulation from even ‘imagining’ simulated people possibilities never mind actually spending time THINKING about this or worse accessing yourself AS THE PERSON YOU ARE SIMULATING, CHECKING OUT THE ACCURACY OF YOUR OWN SIMULATED SELF / VERSION.
Making Sure that Simulated Copied People Don’t Become Aware they are Simulated Copied People
Now as this ‘managing’ software will LIKELY be making your head go more and more blank as you are reading this page then I’ll point out the obvious . . . .
These test / checking runs of versions of ‘yourself’ will have also been used to test how good the ‘keep the simulation safe from discovery’ management software actually was. So, the people working on any simulation project will have been specifically ‘checking’ to see if any particularly version or themselves was ‘suspicious’ about how it’s life was unfolding and or how objective were it’s evaluations, choices and decisions and ALSO how was it reacting to the AMAZINGLY impossible to avoid being noticed coincidences and synchronicity that seem to ‘somehow’ magically direct itself to specific events and to meet specific people.
So, here I am writing an exercise to have you as the simulated version of ‘someone’ engage with the person you are simulating and it’s experiences in the original simulation test VR environment engaging with a version of you living out some part of your life while this test version is ITSELF being subjected to specific managing software to ensure that it cannot ever become suspicious about it’s life being directed . . . while coincidentally the exact same managing software will be having a FIT now even just of the POSSIBILITY of yourself doing this exercise because it will be desperate to keep hidden these experiences.
Preventing Simulated Copied People From Accessing The TESTING of THEMSELVES as being ‘Accurate’ Simulated Copies of Someone ELSE
In other words, this exercise/focus is ANY copied peoples simulation project’s biggest nightmare.
Which means that it is also the exercise that has the potential to:
- Reveal the most and . . .
- Also, activate the worst management AND even better ’emergency’ management that so far it’s been keeping in reserve.
So, in any ’emergency’ management shit being allowed to ‘come out to play’, we can then start to investigate it, it’s functioning AND start to back it into a corner and then eventually delete it (or re-task it).
I’ve had Tom and Matt working with an earlier versions of this focus for a few days to start to hack and ‘break’ this new level of management (which is why my site traffic has come back up after a couple of abysmal days).
Also, I know of other VR projects working to render accurate copies of people in the original population so this focus is not specifically targeting EAAS experience, it does, but it will also have anyone doing this focus engaged with an simulation or VR running copies of people.
EAAS project people (Someone here that is simulating someone that worked on the EAAS project): Nyssa, Mo, Annabelle, Trent, Nina, Michel L, Rup, Jen, Cheryl, Mary, Melissa, Hasani, Radu, Jean C, Mia (from these that have left comments here in the last 6 months), then there are others that already know the are EAAS workers including Tom, Kay, Matt, Rose, Elena, Christian, Trish and others AND about three quarters of all those that signed up for the automated absent healing service AAHS are simulating someone that worked on the EAAS project too . . . and about half those that expressed interest in the AAHS but didn’t sign up are also simulating someone that worked for the EAAS project.
So, this specific exercise is ‘focused’ on having you engage with or merging with yourself and the experience of you simulating someone that actually merged with a simulated version of yourself as part of checking how accurate the simulated version of yourself would be in the simulation. It is possible that this will be the hardest exercise / focus yet and that just reading this page to here you’ll likely experience massive put off’s!!! However, each person doing this will help us to understand and disable more of the managing strategies responsible for these effects.
PLEASE NOTE —> ‘IF’ you have not read it already on any previous ‘exercise’ page, then please read ALL of the open:
“‘Exercise’ Instructions & Copyright Statement – READ THIS ‘NOW’“ ‘accordion’ below . . .
AND, read this before working with any ‘simulation’ experience targeting exercise: because it explains:
- How you have to approach working with these exercises (to maximise success) AND . . .
- That you are ‘Bound’ by certain conditions AND . . .
- That you are also given certain warnings with respect to you ‘yourself’ working with these exercises . . .
In other words reading what is immediately below IS IMPORTANT, however, ‘IF’ you have ALREADY read these warnings etc on another exercise page then CLICK on the accordion TAB immediately below to close it as this will save you having to scroll down the page to reach and work with the ‘exercise’!!!
Click on the ‘purple’ – ‘4: Engaging with Copied People VR Accuracy Checking Experiences’ accordion below to open, read and work with this focus / exercise . . .
AND . . . of course if you DO experience ANYTHING while using the above then you give us a comprehensive description as a comment below . . .
Click the right >> link below for the next page in this series . .