I’ve updated the very,very bottom/last few paragraphs ‘WAREHOUSE’ STORAGE, MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION/SECURITY ‘COSTS/CHARGE’ . . . the warehouse/birth certificate tax it’s for ‘warehouse/storage’ of your subtle/soul/spirit form!!!!
Based on what I’ve presented on previous pages/sections of this series, we are all ‘subtle’ beings or what I’d describe as an energetic/frequency/resonance based life form, that (in our terms) is often locally referred to as the soul or subtle/spirit form.
These subtle beings originated within and hence then ‘appear’ to be natural to an exceptionally different higher frequency/resonance based ‘subtle’ strata, which is just one of a set of stratas that are part of the base characteristics of the entire meta universe’s base structure/configuration.
However, sometime in their (and then our) very, very distant past, ancestral versions of ourselves (the spirit/soul form that is interfaced to the human body avatar) very, very gradually becomes aware of another separate as well as very different parallel to themselves ‘universe’ strata, which in being way, way slower in base matter/frequency terms compared to there own, is then the ‘physical’ universe strata, which (as I described on an earlier page here: The ‘REAL’ Subtle Energetic Body Anatomy of our Androgynous Soul Form & its Differences Compared to the Physical Human Body Explained), they then start to remotely investigate and research what to themselves as an energetic resonance based life form living within a none physical/resonance based ‘subtle’ environment would be an exceptionally strange/alien place/environment (at least compared to there own).
However, over time these physical strata/physical universe investigations of (in most cases) generally inert/lifeless physical worlds/planets eventually results in them finding one (that we know of) that is presenting a vast variety of physical life. On then directly remotely investigating and researching such a world this have result in themselves gradually them learning how to interface themselves more and more ‘coherently/seamlessly’ to different physical animal forms, such that it likely wouldn’t take them long before they started to interface more and more of their subtle populations to some perhaps very different physical animal forms while also then more and more seriously considering and then eventually starting a physical civilisation/culture!!!!
If any subtle culture did consider doing this, it is then also very, very likely that they’d interface some of their subtle population to a variety of animals as part of setting up one or more very small physical earth world communities perhaps also including some wandering tribes as a small herd of horses or as a pack of wolves for example!!!
In them, then having members of their subtle population spending permanent time within a few likely very small communities and or as mobile tribes they’d also then begin to figure out all of the dangers/problems associated with different environments and habitats including for example dangerous predators, poisonous plants, water sources etc. etc. while also giving the subtle researchers focused on the physical ‘colony’ efforts and those working on the ‘experience an incarnated physical life’ project trying to figure out how to support/facilitate their subtle forms to adapt to the physical environment and to being interfaced to an animal form as well as getting used to the planet’s day and night cycle as well of the yearly seasons that are an inherent part of a physical planet’s natural cycles while they also learn to more and more adapt the subtle form and or the interfacing to help them synchronise with these as well as of the habits, instincts and life cycles of the animal specie types that they’d have volunteered or chosen to be interfaced to . . .
If you’ve managed to take in what I’ve been describing above then you’ll now be aware that it is exceptionally likely (as I’ve regularly pointed out elsewhere) that the human body you are presently using the eyes of to read this with is essentially nothing more than a remote vehicle, an ‘avatar’ being driven around by an ‘intelligent’ none physical energetic/resonance based ‘organism’ which coincidentally, is what is commonly described or labelled as the soul, the spirit and or the subtle body form here . . .
The Early ‘Common Knowledge’ Of The Immortal Soul/Spirit/Subtle Form & the Subtle Environment Origins Problem
In this respect, the closer you are to the earlier past times when the first human and or other animals were chosen as part of efforts to interface a much larger population of subtle beings/soul form to the physical earth environment then the more aware these incarnating ‘pioneers’ will absolutely/utterly of themselves as absolutely being a very, very different none physical, subtle/spirit form that has been interfaced/incarnated into a specific physical animal form, very specifically to have an animal avatar experience of living on the surface of a physical planet/world.
It is in fact exceptionally likely that during the earliest ‘moving the subtle population’ to the physical efforts that all of these whom then find themselves interfaced to any physical animal form would actually then be DIRECTLY/EXPLICITLY aware of their immortal subtle being/form origins ‘AND’ they’d also absolutely know that they have been deliberately interfaced to some physical animal form (which could be human or another animal) which, unlike themselves ISN’T ACTUALLY ‘IMMORTAL’, but has a very, very limited life span, at least compared to any immortal being that may have already been around for a few millions of years!!!
In a very basic sense if you are interfacing an invisible/cannot easily be seen/viewed spirit/soul form specifically to one or more physical animal species, very specifically to use this animal as a remote vehicle/avatar and particularly as part of offering the spirit/soul form an incarnated physical/join my physical civilisation life/experience, then isn’t it exceptionally likely that some if not many ‘inherent/normal’ characteristics/details of the immortal/androgynous/asexual subtle/spirit/soul form will be reflected/represented within early physical language!!!!
In this respect isn’t it actually very, very, very likely that early language would be directly as well as exceptionally ‘explicit’ with respect to having words describing both their early circumstances as well as at least some of the characteristics of the very, very different none physical as well as immortal spirit/soul form that now found itself interfaced to a human or other physical animal ‘vehicle’!!!!
ISN’T THIS ‘EXCEPTIONALLY’ LIKELY!!!!!
Some Base Descriptions & Definitions of the Spirit, Soul Form, Being Made into ‘Flesh’ by being Interfaced to a Physical Animal Form
In this respect, it’s possible that some of you whom that are reading this whom are currently interfaced to a human avatar may then actually be aware of the use of and or the meanings of a whole load of often well used terms (at least within certain circles) that have been and or are still currently being used to describe facets of the none human, none physical ‘intelligence’ that is actually what allows humans here to at least have the potential to be intelligent . . . a level of intelligence that maybe actually (for example) allows you to read characters on a screen, presented in a form of writings that are attempting to convey certain meanings and or concepts/ideas and particularly as part of trying to define and or explain certain specific things to others . . . which after reading, you can then attempt to ‘THINK’ about and or then ‘EVALUATE’ . . . which in some cases for certain people can easily be made difficult because in that all of your ‘real’ thinking processes are literally going on SOMEWHERE ELSE then your ability to take in and evaluate anything can then via the bi-directional interfacing be manipulated and particularly via systems designed into the interfacing and or your none physical real ‘spirit/soul/subtle forms ‘thinking’ processes.
Maybe an example of the effects of this being done would be that you’ve read this page and also the previous one BUT you didn’t relate what was written to any of the terms I’m going to point out below never mind not having at least some ‘musings’ related to specific words and or early ‘language’ possibilities which would perhaps imply that you are being managed to NOT THINK OF WELL USED AS WELL AS OBVIOUS ‘RELATED’ INFORMATION & OR DESCRIPTORS/TERMS that are actually ‘evidence’ of what I’ve been pointing out/trying to make more explicit within these pages!!!!
PLEASE NOTE: For the terms and definitions below I have searched the internet and taken and then blended together descriptions which are presented on sites offering various dictionary and or etymology (past language origins) references/definitions!!!!
Base Descriptions/Definition of the Soul: A substantial entity believed to be that in each person which lives, feels, thinks and wills. The soul, in many religious, philosophical, and mythological traditions, is the incorporeal essence of a living being. Soul or psyche (in Ancient Greek is equivalent “to breathe”) comprises the mental abilities of a living being: reason, character, feeling, consciousness, memory, perception, thinking, etc.
Sometimes said to mean originally “coming from or belonging to the sea,” because that was supposed to be the stopping place of the soul before birth or after death [Barnhart]; if so, it would be from Proto-Germanic *saiwaz (see sea).
For some it’s the spiritual or animating or vital principle embodied in human beings, all rational and spiritual beings, or the universe. It gives ‘life’ the vital principle and hence then is what ‘gives life’ to physical organisms!!! Plato’s view of the soul: Plato considered the psyche/soul to be the essence of a person, being that which decides how we behave. He considered this essence to be an incorporeal, eternal occupant of our being. Plato says that even after death, the soul exists and is able to think. He believed that as bodies die, the soul is continually reborn in subsequent bodies.
COMMENT/S: Again we’ve a lot of what can only be described as indirect and for the most part difficult to conceptually understand, never mind the need to interpret/decode ‘symbolic’ terms/descriptions presented within the above.
As described on the previous page the subtle body form is vaguely equivalent to a dynamic ball of plasma/’energy’ i.e. it is frequency/resonance based and hence then is exceptionally different to and then actually very hard to describe in ‘physical’ only conceptual terms.
However, let me try and do this now by specifically using ‘BREATH’ to ‘illustrate’ this ‘energetic/resonance/frequency based none physical’ form in a way that pretty accurately ‘symbolically’ represents the base ‘energetic/frequency’ characteristics of this form!!!! Basically, if on a very cold day you step outside and take in a large breath of air and then after a few seconds deliberately breathe out through your mouth then you will actually ‘SEE’ your breath because it temporarily becomes visible as an amorphous semi transparent cloud of temporarily elevated in temperature (compared to the surrounding air) dynamically moving ‘air and likely water’ particles . . . which also ‘fits’ with the Atman reference further below too . . .
Base Descriptions/Definition of Incorporeal Essence: (usage begins in 15th century) Middle English incorporealle, from Anglo-French incorporel, from Latin incorporeus, from in- + corporeus corporeal. Not corporeal : 1. having no material body or form but a spiritual form, OR relating to, or constituting a right that is based on property (such as bonds or patents). Synonyms (words of equivalent meaning): bodiless, ethereal, formless, immaterial, insubstantial, nonmaterial, nonphysical, spiritual, unbodied, unsubstantial. Antonyms (words of opposite meaning): bodily, corporeal, material, physical, substantial.
Atman (n.): in Hindu philosophy, the self or soul, 1785, from Sanskrit atma “essence, breath, soul,” from PIE *etmen “breath” (a root found in Sanskrit and Germanic; source also of Old English æðm, Dutch adem, Old High German atum “breath,” Old English eþian, Dutch ademen “to breathe”).
COMMENT/S: Let me point out a few conceptually ‘weird’ things here!!!! You essentially have a subtle, spirit, soul form/entity/species that is both directly and automatically taking in ‘nutrition/sustenance’ directly from the environment. Hence, in terms of finding a ‘best fit/closest physical earth life equivalent’, and particularly in human/earth conceptual terms related to life, would make the soul/spirit/subtle form equivalent to something like a plant (or better still maybe a ‘tree’) specifically because trees take in ‘radiation/emissions’ from the sun (to use as ‘energy’) as well as invisible components directly from the air (specifically CO2 as ‘food’). Hence then a ‘tree’ would perhaps be the closest equivalent in ‘life on earth’ terms to the spirit/soul/subtle forms food/nutritional and or energy intake abilities/capacity . . .
Strangely I couldn’t help notice that within Dante’s circles of hell descriptions, he describes one (the 7th hell of ‘Violence Against the Self) that has people being made into a tree. Strangely, in that Dante describes quite a few of what are in many ways, way more conceptually realistic ‘hells’ BUT then suddenly throws into the mix a hell where people are made into a tree . . . AND . . . remember what I mentioned about the management via the interfacing . . . strangely there is a deafening ‘SILENCE’ around this possibility, there is never any ‘WTF’ response along the lines of . . .
“How could anyone be made into a tree or experience ‘Being a TREE'”!!!!
Which shouldn’t come as a surprise should it when ‘conceptually’ the only way you can become a tree is to be interfaced to one, which would be no more difficult than what has been done to interface you reading this to your human avatar/vehicle.
Perhaps it would be more realistic to translate the ‘Violence Against the Self’ as being despair/desperation due to themselves no longer being a subtle form living within the subtle environment, within which you don’t have to drink water regularly, nor eat food 2 or 3 times a day, just to continue to live, nor do subtle/spirit forms need to work to buy food either!!!
In this respect it’s then very possible that an aware of themselves as a subtle form interfaced to a human would perhaps prefer to be what they really are while also perhaps preferring to live within its natural/original subtle environment i.e. living as a subtle spirit form that automatically takes in all sustenance needs automatically from its environment while never ever having to work regularly to ‘live’ either . . . such that, is it not possible. maybe even likely that some, whom on finding themselves incarnated into the physical (perhaps even forcibly, perhaps they were press ganged/kidnapped in the subtle!!!!) might find themselves at least ‘unconsciously/subconsciously’ becoming desperate with respect to finding themselves living a physical life . . . perhaps even to the point of becoming suicidal . . . !!!!
However, if they did then kill themselves/their physical body (which in their terms is perhaps nothing more than a remote physical vehicle/avatar used to engage with the earth’s physical environment) . . . and hence then are perhaps doing this specifically to escape perhaps ‘some’ hellish physical circumstances . . . then how much of a piss take do you think it would be for them to then find themselves interfaced into the physical yet again, but this time as a tree . . . which, I strongly suspect they’d find a lot harder to kill/de-interface themselves from at least compared to a human animal form . . . despite that they are also finding themselves as a tree experiencing circumstances equivalent to being tortured . . . ‘I quote’ . . .
” . . . are then fed upon by Harpies, hideous clawed birds with the faces of women; the trees are only permitted to speak when broken and bleeding . . . Dante learns that these suicides, unique among the dead, will not be corporally resurrected after the Final Judgement since they threw their bodies away; instead, they will maintain their bushy form, with their own corpses hanging from the thorny limbs . . . “
WHAT A PISS TAKE!!!!
Strangely however, we actually have films depicting intelligent trees (don’t tell me you’ve magically forgotten about the “Day of the Triffids” (as both a film and series)). Strangely however, if you actually were living as any type of tree you’d expect to produce ‘blossom’ i.e. flowers, in which case anyone here that’s lets say ‘representing’ someone interfaced to a tree would perhaps feel compelled to wear ‘flowery’ clothes perhaps specifically at times related to the tree’s flowering time/season!!!
Strangely, basic observation abilities and or the ability to make connections between directly related topics/experiences/FACTS doesn’t often seem to be a strong point within our weird reality here!!! DOES IT!!!
Can you think of any even more bizarre as well as DIRECTLY/STARKLY SHOCKING ‘people as trees’ possibilities!!!! Strangely, if you cannot, then perhaps this means that that you are then completely unaware that we actually DO HAVE PEOPLE BEING VISIBLY DEPICTED/PRESENTED AS TREES HERE!!!
I’m being deadly serious about this!!!! We ‘do’ have people being presented as if they are a tree here!!!
Here are some pictures:
If you make an effort to read about how their condition impacts themselves then you’ll become aware that what they are experiencing is HELLISH!!!!
Strangely, in myself making an effort to read about these people/this condition I’ve not once noticed any scientist/academic/doctor type mention how this condition makes those with this condition have many visible characteristics that are strongly reminiscent of a tree . . . hence then it’s not a surprise that I’ve also not noticed anyone correlate this condition to Dante’s 7th circle of hell either . . . ‘basic observational abilities’ coupled with wide ranging scale of interests/knowledge . . . often reveals all sorts of very interesting correlations . . .
More correlation weird experiences/evidence relating to incarnated ‘people’ as subtle beings can be found on this page here: Details of our Subtle/Spirit Form, the Subtle Environment & the Various/Many Anomalous Experiences Substituting for these Here
Base Description/Definition of ‘Spirit’: Meaning “supernatural immaterial creature; angel, demon; an apparition, invisible corporeal being of an airy nature” is attested from mid-14c.; from late 14c. as “a ghost” (see ghost (n.)). Your spirit is the part of you that is not physical and that consists of your character and feelings. A person’s spirit is the immaterial intelligent or sentient part of a person i.e. the ‘non-physical part of them’ that is believed to remain alive after the death of the physical body. When someone dies it is the ‘spirit’ that leaves the body, which is sometimes seen and then described as a ghost or spirit form by others (that have usually been close to them)!!! The use of the word spirit then also refers to a ghost (as a supernatural being).
COMMENT/S: . . . I’d yet again like to point out that animals are driven in a base sense by instinct/instincts/drives rather than ‘intelligence’, never mind that in the above it is made clear that it is the ‘spirit’ which is the ‘immaterial’ intelligence i.e. it is this ‘spirit’ form what actually confers the ‘intelligence’ on the human form!!!
Past Word Origins & Definitions of Psyche, Psychology & Psychic
Base Descriptions/Definition of the Psyche: (plural psyches is a shortened form of psychology, from French psychologie, from Latin psychologia) denotes the human soul, mind, or spirit. (Psyche). The human mind as the central force in thought, emotion, and behavior of an individual. Psychology: The science of the human soul; specifically, the systematic or scientific knowledge of the powers and functions of the human soul, so far as they are known by consciousness; a treatise on the human soul. Psychology: the science conversant about the phenomena of the mind, or conscious subject, or self.
Past Origins of Psyche (n.): 1640s, “animating spirit,” from Latin psyche, from Greek psykhē “the soul, mind, spirit; life, one’s life, the invisible animating principle or entity which occupies and directs the physical body; understanding, the mind (as the seat of thought), faculty of reason” (personified as Psykhē, the beloved of Eros), also “ghost, spirit of a dead person;” probably akin to psykhein “to blow, cool,” from PIE root *bhes- “to blow, to breathe” (source also of Sanskrit bhas-), “Probably imitative” [Watkins].
Also in ancient Greek, “departed soul, spirit, ghost,” and often represented symbolically as a butterfly or moth (a ‘flying through the air’ creature). The word had extensive sense development in Platonic philosophy and Jewish-influenced theological writing of St. Paul (compare spirit (n.)). Meaning “human soul” is from 1650s. In English, psychological sense “mind,” is attested by 1910.
Past Origins of Psychic (adj.): 1872, “of or pertaining to the human soul” (earlier psychical, 1640s), from Greek psykhikos “of the soul, spirit, or mind”.
COMMENT/S: the above collection of definitions will give you some idea of how over time ‘original’ in the past and perhaps way more ‘ACCURATE’ definitions/meanings are superseded by modern and in fact more and more misleading ‘science’ based definitions all very gradually making the original and hence then way more ‘ACCURATE’ past/historical context/meanings of specific terms less and less obvious!!!
As the soul/spirit/subtle form (as described on the previous page) is always in the air i.e. it is always ‘flying’ as there is no ground then representing or referring to the departed ‘spirit’ as a flying creature such as a moth or butterfly is in a conceptual sense pretty accurate/realistic!!!!
Let me give you some yet more ‘interesting’ words to think about . . .
Past Word Origins & Definitions Related to being Being ‘Animate/an Animal Form’ that requires to continually ‘BREATHE’ to Continue to Live/Stay Alive!!!
Animate (adj.): “alive,” late 14c., from Latin animatus, past participle of animare “give breath to,” also “to endow with a particular spirit, to give courage to, enliven,” from anima “life, breath” (from PIE root *ane- “to breathe”).
Exanimate (adj.): “inanimate, lifeless,” 1530s, from Latin exanimatus “lifeless, dead,” past participle of exanimare “to deprive of air or breath; tire, fatigue; to deprive of life; to terrify,” from ex “out” (see ex-) + animare “give breath to” (see animate (v.)). Related: Exanimation.
Pneuma (n.): used in English in various sense, from Greek pneuma “a blowing, a wind, blast; breeze; influence; breathed air, breath; odor, scent; spirit of a person; inspiration, a spirit, ghost,” from pnein “to blow, to breathe,” from PIE root *pneu- “to breathe,” of imitative origin (compare Greek pnoe “breath,” pnoia “breathing;” Old English fnora “sneezing,” fnæran “to snort”).
*ane- Proto-Indo-European root meaning “to breathe.”: It forms all or part of: anemo-; anemometer; anemone; anima; animadversion; animadvert; animal; animalcule; animalistic; animate; animation; animatronic; anime; animism; animosity; animus; Enid; equanimity; longanimity; magnanimous; pusillanimous; unanimous.
It is the hypothetical source of/evidence for its existence is provided by: Sanskrit aniti “breathes;” Greek anemos “wind;” Latin animus “rational soul, mind, life, mental powers, consciousness, sensibility; courage, desire,” anima “living being, soul, mind, disposition, passion, courage, anger, spirit, feeling;” Old Irish anal, Welsh anadl “breath,” Old Irish animm “soul;” Gothic uzanan “to exhale,” Old Norse anda “to breathe,” Old English eðian “to breathe;” Old Church Slavonic vonja “smell, breath;” Armenian anjn “soul.”
COMMENT/S: How many different references/angles of distant past historical descriptions do you need before it sinks in that the soul/spirit is describing in terms of ‘breath’ as well as ‘feelings and sensitivities’ i.e. we have terms and descriptions being used to categorise ‘something’ that don’t relate/equate to a physical/material form BUT they do relate to ‘something’ equivalent to an amorphous energetic cloud like being/form that in then being INTERFACED to the human form is then ‘animating’ the human form never mind while also very like being responsible for the human’s level of intelligence (at least compared to the other physical ‘animals’ that we have here)!!!!
Base descriptions of the Higher Self & Divine Self: Higher self is a term associated with multiple belief systems, but its basic premise describes an eternal, omnipotent, conscious, and intelligent being, who is one’s real self. Blavatsky formally defined the higher self as “Atma the inseparable ray of the Universe and one self”.
Many people refer to the levels of your being using such words as higher self, soul, spirit, and Divine Self. It is also referred to as the Divine Self, ‘spirit’, God/ess and for some ‘The Presence’ or the ‘I AM PRESENCE’, all of which are coincidentally referring to the source or essence of all life. The Divine Self is described by some as within you, while being as eternal, infinite consciousness, free from all attachments and beyond all action; it is described as constant and unchanging, birth less and deathless.
COMMENT/S: Strangely in describing what is presented here as the higher or divine self and or spirit in these terms (as both birth less and deathless/eternal) this then directly implies that this form/being/organism neither experiences being born nor does it experience itself as ever dying either. Which actually then directly implies that it is an organism that is not only immortal but for it to not experience being born (which is the outcome of sexual conjugation/propagation) then directly implies that it is an organism that actually propagates by ‘dividing’ itself, very specifically because this is the only form of propagation that produces offspring that then aren’t actually given birth to i.e. they are not then actually ‘born’.
This Self/the Divine self (likely called divine because it’s both immortal AND its view point is above ‘everything’) can only be known through a direct experience of ‘It’ and cannot be known through the rational mind. It is described as the Oneness from which all life comes, and to which all life returns. Your soul is also described as living on the soul plane/level, a dimension of light and vibration . . .
COMMENT/S: It was hard, pretty much impossible for me to get my head around interpreting the above until I looked up the old/older meaning of ‘Life’ . . .
Life (n.): Old English life (dative lif) “animated corporeal existence; lifetime, period between birth and death; the history of an individual from birth to death, written account of a person’s life; way of life (good or bad); condition of being a living thing, opposite of death; spiritual existence imparted by God, through Christ, to the believer,” from Proto-Germanic *leiban (source also of Old Norse lif “life, body,” Old Frisian, Old Saxon lif “life, person, body,” Dutch lijf “body,” Old High German lib “life,” German Leib “body”), properly “continuance, perseverance,” from PIE root *leip- “to stick, adhere.”
COMMENT/S: Well, the above makes it exceptionally clear that the early meaning of the word ‘life’ specifically only refers to those living an ‘animated corporeal existence’ i.e. the word ‘life’ wasn’t originally used to describe any/all ‘PHYSICAL’ ANIMAL FORMS/PHYSICAL LIVING THINGS, rather the word ‘LIFE’ was only used to refer to those that are incarnated into flesh i.e. it only refers to those that are ‘interfaced’ to a physical animal form!!!!
Now, if you/we ‘really’ are a form that is equivalent to ‘breath/air’ which is then interfaced i.e. incarnated i.e. is made to be ‘in flesh’ then wouldn’t it be interesting to see what past definitions of these specific words reveal!!!
Past Word Origins & Definitions of Corporeal, Becoming Flesh/Carnal & Incarnate, Incarnating & Ghost
Flesh (n.): Old English flæsc “flesh, meat, muscular parts of animal bodies; body (as opposed to soul).
COMMENT/S: Please note that the above sentence was copied and pasted as is (i.e. it included the (as opposed to soul) part), implying that in the distant past it was common/normal to view yourself as ‘not of the flesh’ BUT as an incarnated soul/spirit form!!!
Carnal (adj.): c. 1400, “physical, human, mortal,” from Old French carnal and directly from Latin carnalis “fleshly, of the flesh,” from carnis “of the flesh,” genitive of caro “flesh, meat,” “flesh,” originally “a piece of flesh,” from PIE root *sker- (1) “to cut.” . . Meaning “sensual, pertaining to the passions and appetites of the flesh” is from early 15c.; that of “worldly, sinful, not spiritual” is from mid-15c. Carnal knowledge “sexual intercourse” is attested from early 15c. and was in legal use by 1680s. Medieval Latin carnalis meant “natural, of the same blood,” a sense sometimes found in Middle English carnal.
COMMENT/S: Just in case you’ve already forgotten or haven’t read the previous page, then ‘we’ as a ‘subtle/soul/spirit’ type of life form/species are actually completely none sexual specifically because the soul/spirit form is actually androgynous i.e. the soul/spirit form doesn’t have any body gender/sexuality differentiation. Hence then, in being interfaced/incarnated into an animal type that is of two genders/sexes, means that these incarnated forms would then automatically gain/experience so called ‘carnal knowledge’. Basically, an/all interfaced/incarnated ‘spirit/soul/subtle’ forms would gain knowledge/experience of HOW PHYSICAL ANIMALS REPRODUCE i.e. via direct ‘sexual intercourse/coupling’ . . .
This would seem like a good place to check out terms/words related to ‘incarnate/incarnation’!!!!
Incarnate (adj.): late 14c., “embodied in flesh, in human or bodily form” (of souls, spirits, etc.), from Late Latin incarnatus “made flesh,” a frequent word among early Christian writers, past-participle adjective from Latin incarnare “to make flesh” (see incarnation). Of qualities or abstractions, 1530s.
Incarnate (v.): “clothe or embody in flesh,” 1530s, a back-formation from incarnation, or else from Late Latin incarnatus “made flesh,” past participle of incarnare “to make flesh; be made flesh.” Meaning “make or form flesh” (as in healing a wound) is from 1670s. Related: Incarnated; incarnating.
Incarnation (n.): c. 1300, “embodiment of God in the person of Christ,” from Old French incarnacion “the Incarnation” (12c.), from Late Latin incarnationem (nominative incarnatio), “act of being made flesh” (used by Church writers especially in reference to God in Christ; source also of Spanish encarnacion, Italian incarnazione), noun of action from past participle stem of Late Latin incarnari “be made flesh,” from in- “in” (from PIE root *en “in”) + caro (genitive carnis) “flesh” (originally “a piece of flesh,” from PIE root *sker- (1) “to cut”). Glossed in Old English as inflæscnes, inlichomung. As “person or thing that is the embodiment” (of some quality, deity, etc.) from 1742.
COMMENT/S: Let me make an effort to be very explicit about our very distant past scene/circumstances for yourself . . . we have well used embedded terms within ‘western’ society making it very, very clear that we are forms that are being incarnated into flesh i.e. we are ‘being made flesh’ which is an apt description if you/we are all actually ‘something else’ that is from ‘somewhere else’ that is then being directly interfaced to an animal form!!!!
Historical, Distant Past Word Origins & Definitions of Immortal, Immortality as well as Mortal
Base Description/Definition of ‘Ghost’: The spirit of a dead person, sometimes represented as a pale, almost transparent image of that person that some people believe appears to people who are alive. An apparition of a dead person which is believed to appear or become manifest to the living, typically as a nebulous image.
Ghost language origins: Old English gast “breath; good or bad spirit, angel, demon; person, man, human being,” in Biblical use “soul, spirit, life,” it is the English representative of the usual West Germanic word for “supernatural being.” In Christian writing in Old English it is used to render Latin spiritus (see spirit (n.)), a sense preserved in Holy Ghost. Sense of “disembodied spirit of a dead person,” especially imagined as wandering among the living or haunting them, is attested from late 14c. and returns the word toward its likely prehistoric sense.
Also, most Indo-European words for “soul, spirit” also double with reference to supernatural spirits. Many have a base sense of “appearance” (such as Greek phantasma; French spectre; Polish widmo, from Old Church Slavonic videti “to see;” Old English scin, Old High German giskin, originally “appearance, apparition,” related to Old English scinan, Old High German skinan “to shine”). Other concepts are in French revenant, literally “returning” (from the other world).
COMMENT/S: . . . I’d also like to point out that we have a lot of well recorded/documented cases of people whom have died (BUT just temporarily before being resuscitated/revived) whom have themselves then described having a viewpoint that is very, very obviously outside of their temporarily dead human body form, including of themselves seeing their own body being dealt with by doctors/nurses coincidentally in such detail that some of whom have had these OUT OF THEIR PHYSICAL BODY experiences can recall both the activities AND in some cases the conversations of those present around their recently dead body. . . . in other words we not only have people being ‘seen’ as ghosts BUT we have people having experiences of essentially BEING A GHOST too . . . both of these types of experience directly imply that the ‘intelligence’ exhibited by the human form is then independent/separate from the human body form itself which also then directly implies that it is this ‘ghost/spirit’ form that actually confers the ‘intelligence’ on the human animal/body . . .
I am sure that within my own personal lifetime ghosts have gone from being depicted as a white transparent amorphous i.e. not ‘really’ human body form that was generally depicted as a flowing as well as a floating off the floor form. In doing some image searches and looking for images of past ghosts as compared to how they are presented in modern/recent films . . . this gradual transformation shift of this form from a just slightly vaguely human floating in the air (sometimes half in or half out of walls or flying through them) as an indistinct wavy ‘edges’ indistinctly flowing/flying type figure to more and more being depicted as nothing more than a transparent human now standing pretty solidly on the floor . . .
Historical, Distant Past Word Origins & Definitions of Immortal, Immortality as well as Mortal
Mortality (n.): mid-14c., mortalite, “condition of being subject to death or the necessity of dying,” from Old French mortalite “massacre, slaughter; fatal illness; poverty; destruction” (12c.) and directly from Latin mortalitem (nominative mortalitas) “state of being mortal; subjection to death,” from mortalis “subject to death, mortal,” from PIE root *mer- “to rub away, harm” (also “to die” and forming words referring to death and to beings subject to death).
Immortal (adj.): late 14c., “deathless,” from Latin immortalis “deathless, undying” (of gods), “imperishable, endless” (of fame, love, work, etc.), from assimilated form of in- “not, opposite of” (see in- (1)) + mortalis “mortal” (from PIE root *mer- “to rub away, harm,” also “to die” and forming words referring to death and to beings subject to death). In reference to fame, literature, etc., “unceasing, destined to endure forever, never to be forgotten, lasting a long time,” attested from early 15c. (also in classical Latin). As a noun, “an immortal being,” from 1680s.
COMMENT/S: Yet again (as with a lot of specific word meanings over time in the distant past) notice how the use/meaning of the word is over time being shifted sideways so that it ends up describing/referring to something that is actually very different i.e. in this case from describing an immortal being to someone that is immortalised because of ‘fame’!!!! Below there is another example of this type of gradual creeping shift with respect to word meanings with respect to another angle of spirit word which is as a ‘ghost’ . . .
Immortality (n.): mid-14c., “deathlessness,” from Old French immortalité (13c.) and directly from Latin immortalitatem (nominative immortalitas) “deathlessness, endless life,” also “imperishable fame,” from immortalis “undying” (see immortal). Of fame, etc., “quality of being permanent,” early 15c.
COMMENT/S: Can any academic explain as to why an essentially mentally, conceptually and ‘intellectually’ limited animal form that in needing to eat regularly including likely hunting and then killing and then eating animals AND whom is also very likely part of some tribe such that they will all then be very, very, very, VERY aware of death BEING UNAVOIDABLE and specifically because either naturally or via sabre tooth tiger etc encounters they themselves and or their friends/people they know are regularly killed actually then somehow, seemingly ‘magically’ actually even come up with the concept of immortality never mind of then conceiving of ANYTHING AT ALL as being ‘immortal’ . . . never mind that this ‘immortal’ concept is used to DIRECTLY REFER TO SOME ASPECT OF ‘THEMSELVES’!!!!
Why would any intelligent animal form that arose on a physical world and hence then absolutely only have experience of natural ‘physical’ phenomena as well as a built in animal experience/instincts mostly focused on surviving generation after generation have or develop concepts/terms/words such a mortal and or immortal, never mind of actually attributing a part of themselves as being ‘immortal’ which means a part that always lives is alive for ever and ever and ever!!!!
>> THIS DOESN’T MAKE ANY SENSE AT ALL <<
Past Word Usage & Definitions of both Avatar & also Deity = Natural Gods
>> REMEMBER WHAT I WROTE AT THE VERY TOP OF THIS PAGE!!!! <<
“In a very basic sense if you are interfacing an invisible remote spirit/soul form specifically to one or more physical animal species, very specifically to use these these animals as a remote vehicle/avatar as part of offering the spirit/soul form an incarnated physical/join my physical civilisation life/experience, then isn’t it exceptionally likely that some if not many ‘inherent/normal’ characteristics/details of the immortal/androgynous/asexual subtle form in being ‘interfaced’ to one of more physical animal species will be reflected/represented within early physical language and then writing efforts!!!!”
Avatar (n.): 1784, “descent of a Hindu deity to earth in an incarnate or tangible form,” from Sanskrit avatarana “descent” (of a deity to the earth in incarnate form), from ava- “off, down” (from PIE root *au- (2) “off, away”) + base of tarati “(he) crosses over,” from PIE root *tere- (2) “cross over, pass through, overcome.” also meaning “concrete embodiment of something abstract” is from 1815.
COMMENT/S: all/everything that what I write above on this page is basically repeatedly suggesting that we are a none physical self existing spirit form BUT in now being incarnate such that we are now currently wearing a flesh overcoat . . . until we physically die . . . after which we apparently ‘cross over’ . . . perhaps ‘cross over’ means we’d be back at least temporarily into the subtle strata . . . before perhaps being born again/reincarnated which essentially means being re-interfaced to another animal form!!!
Overall, from the above, we have descriptions of a form that is described as being interfaced to a human/animal being directly described as having some ‘GOD LIKE’ characteristics including being immortal while also being described as something higher i.e. it’s conceptually described as something that was originally above i.e. higher which is then subjected to a descent. In other words, specifically from this ‘forms’ perspective/viewpoint it’s being described as being shifted in sensory/perception and perhaps awareness terms from a higher realm/place to a lower realm/place, which is also described as it ‘crossing over’ too, which is yet another way of stating that perhaps in perceptual/sensory and or awareness terms these were all originally focused ‘somewhere’ on a higher level BUT now are focused somewhere else that’s described as lower!!!!
However, if they maintained the physical worlds research/investigation teams and or those directing these whom originally both helped investigate the physical planet as well as designing the early physical world ‘incarnation’ interfacing to actually have them remotely view/look out for those they’d incarnated i.e. which would have them all directly viewing/remotely viewing all those they incarnated from above, i.e they’d then SPECIFICALLY HAVE A VIEW POINT EQUIVALENT TO THEM BEING IN THE SO CALLED ‘HEAVENS’!!!
Keep in mind that the ‘incarnated’ population are attempting to learn to drive/handle what to them is an alien life form (which for all intents and purposes you could describe as being an ‘avatar’) while also then trying to get used to living as this animal within an exceptionally different/alien environment which includes it having an regular LIGHT DAY/DARK NIGHT repeating all of the time cycle. Hence then, isn’t it likely that the upper subtle forms monitoring the incarnated population and or any monitoring/evaluating tech/systems would warn them as and when needed? Including, helping them to avoid accidents and or dangerous places, isn’t it likely that they’d even give them direct ‘severe weather’ warnings too!!! Although isn’t it possible that they might intervene if those below were for example about to be attacked by a sabre toothed tiger or fall down a well hidden hole or be at risk of drowning etc. etc . . .
If upper subtle forms and or monitoring systems acted as ‘guardians/advisors and or protectors’ with perhaps a specific directive to step in during physical life threatening circumstances then wouldn’t it appear as if they’d have unbelievable, verging on ‘magical’ abilities, such that they’d perhaps appear as being ‘God’ like at least from the perspective of those that were part of the normal less knowledgeable members of the subtle population whom were incarnated into the physical/having a physical life ‘experience’?!?!?
Deity (n.): c. 1300, deite, “divine nature, godhood, attributes of a god;” late 14c., “a god, God, the Supreme Being or self-existing spirit,” from Old French deité, from Late Latin deitatem (nominative deitas) “divine nature,” coined by Augustine from Latin deus “god,” from PIE *deiwos “god,” from root *dyeu- “to shine,” in derivatives “sky, heaven, god.” From 1580s as “a being to whom a divine or godlike nature is attributed.”
COMMENT/S: So, we have plenty of past language references describing ourselves as essentially being a ‘spirit’ incarnated into flesh i.e. that we are each a spirit/soul form being interfaced to an animal avatar/vehicle . . . hence then within the descriptions above ‘God’ i.e. ‘ourselves’ is described as a self-existing spirit (i.e. that we are actually independent of the physical form ) i.e. this implies that when not incarnated or before you started to be continually incarnated i.e. ‘re-incarnated’ again and again you were a freely living spirit/subtle/soul form!!!! I’d advise you to re-read the ‘incarnate’ references above a few times for this to properly sink in!!!
PLEASE NOTE: I’ve presented more angles of all of these ‘interfaced to a human’ possibilities written from a ‘matrix’ film analysis angle/perspective that also specifically goes into the language aspects associated with the word ‘matrix’ which turn out to be extensive as well as extensively revealing too on this page here: Matrix Film, Plato’s Cave, Theory of Forms, Metempsychosis & Platonic Dualism Comparisons!!!!
So, if all of us here are ‘actually’ some sort of none physical form from a none physical reality whom are each then being ‘interfaced’ to a human form then doesn’t this somewhat directly imply that we must all (whether we believe in such things or not) must then be being ‘incarnated into’ i.e. ‘interfaced to’ a human form while also, very likely being continually incarnated i.e. repeatedly reincarnated after the remote vehicle, human avatar form kicks the bucket i.e. actually dies!!!!
Wouldn’t the Greatest UPPER ‘Support’ Efforts Focus on Incarnating/Birth and or De-Interfacing/Death Efforts?
If we ‘really’ are of a form/being that never ever dies such that it/we are all being repeatedly interfaced/incarnated and then re-interfaced/re-incarnated then are there any specific word/words that would directly reflect/represent ourselves as being interfaced to and or repeatedly re-interfaced to the next available/suitable human fetus that would then be within a female’s pregnant ‘womb’?!?!?
Even more strangely, if this is all utter nonsense, i.e. if within our early origins we are not immortal subtle beings, whom then become aware of a parallel ‘physical’ strata which on then being investigated and on finding a world with physical life results in people becoming ‘experts’ in various aspects of the planet earth which they achieve by learning how to interface themselves to one or more different types of animal forms after which they then interface more and more of their own subtle culture’s population to a physical avatar form. However, in that to do this, they’d have to become experts in the human reproduction system as well as of the timing of the processes/stages of development of the fetus during pregnancy as part of interfacing the subtle form to the developing fetus correctly.
In this respect, wouldn’t you then expect that the specific immortal subtle beings/forms whom in the very distant past likely spent ages studying/researching/absorbed in the likely many and varied as well as complex factors related of the subtle form to human fetus interfacing efforts to such an extent that if in the future they themselves were also then interfaced to a physical form then isn’t it possible, maybe even likely that they’d have these specific past experiences resurfacing!?!?!?
Strangely this book for example “Parenting Begins Before Conception: A Guide to Preparing Body, Mind and Spirit for you and your future child” describes and goes into the spirit to human interfacing possibilities specifically IN VERY GREAT DETAIL!!!
Entire Subtle Culture Populations Being Interfaced/Incarnated as part of a Physical Earth Civilisation Possibilities
If you are knowingly setting up a ‘physical’ civilisation that would involve massive physical environment research as well as massive efforts to develop interfacing technologies for a project that would involve having to house and or protect/keep safe the stored (likely in a secure ‘pod’ somewhere) a very large population which also likely needs to be permanently monitored as well as checked to ensure that the subtle form doesn’t degrade in some way due to being inert/inactive . . . then wouldn’t all of this involve a super/ultra massive effort and or expense for any culture that was intent on doing this . . . AND wouldn’t all of this require a massive and highly organised ‘organisation’ to oversee all of this and or perhaps many sub organisations to deal with different aspects of these efforts . . .
As a start to this section, I’m going to come back to Incorporeal Essence from above: (usage begins in 15th century) Middle English incorporealle, from Anglo-French incorporel, from Latin incorporeus, from in- + corporeus corporeal. Not corporeal : 1. having no material body or form but a spiritual form, OR relating to, or constituting a right that is based on property (such as bonds or patents).
Incorporeal (adj.): early 15c., “spiritual, immaterial,” with -al (1) and Late Latin incorporeus “without body,” from in- “not” (see in- (1)) + adjective from corpus (genitive corporis) “body” (from PIE root *kwrep- “body, form, appearance”). The Old French adjective was incorporel. Glossed in Old English as lichhaemleas (see lich).
I want you to have a think about the last reference above: relating to, or constituting a right that is based on property (such as bonds or patents). Incorporeal Essence Incarnating means that you are Born!!!
Corpus (n.): “matter of any kind,” literally “a body,” (plural corpora), late 14c., “body,” from Latin corpus, literally “body” (see corporeal). The sense of “body of a person” (mid-15c. in English) and “collection of facts or things” (1727 in English) both were present in Latin.
Corporeal (adj.): 1610s, “of a material or physical nature, not mental or spiritual,” with adjectival suffix -al (1) + Latin corporeus “of the nature of a body,” from corpus “body” (living or dead), from PIE *kwrpes, from root *kwrep- “body, form, appearance.” Meaning “relating to a material body or physical thing” is from 1660s. Related: Corporeality, corporeally.
Corporation (n.): mid-15c., corporacioun, “persons united in a body for some purpose,” from such use in Anglo-Latin, from Late Latin corporationem (nominative corporatio) “assumption of a body” (used of the incarnation of Christ), noun of action from past-participle stem of Latin corporare “embody, make or fashion into a body,” from corpus (genitive corporis) “body, dead body, animal body,” also “a whole composed of united parts, a structure, system, community, corporation, political body, a guild” (from PIE root *kwrep- “body, form, appearance”). Meaning “legally authorized entity, artificial person created by law from a group or succession of persons” (such as municipal governments and modern business companies) is from 1610s.
Corporate (adj.): early 15c., “united in one body, constituted as a legal corporation,” as a number of individuals empowered to do business as an individual, in early use often of municipalities, from Latin corporatus, past participle of corporare “make or fashion into a body, furnish with a body,” also “to make into a corpse, kill,” from corpus (genitive corporis) “body” (from PIE root *kwrep- “body, form, appearance”). The past participle, corporatus, also was used as a noun meaning “member of a corporation.”
*kwrep-: Proto-Indo-European root meaning “body, form, appearance,” probably a verbal root meaning “to appear.”. It forms all or part of: corporal (adj.) “of or belonging to the body;” corporate; corporation; corporeal; corps; corpse; corpulence; corpulent; corpus; corpuscle; corsage; corse; corset; incorporeal; incorporate; leprechaun; midriff.
COMMENT/S: Is it only me that finds it strange that we have a spread of related words including incorporeal linking being incarnated into the physical and incorporations which is the legal term meaning to legally found (perhaps!!!) a ‘physical’ ‘company’ or ‘Corporate’ ‘entity’ that all originate from the root term/concept of *Kwerp-!!!! hence ‘incorporate’ below implies a none physical organisation/united body of people
Incorporate (v.): late 14c., “to put (something) into the body or substance of (something else), blend; absorb, eat,” also “solidify, harden,” often in medical writing, from Late Latin incorporatus, past participle of incorporare “unite into one body, embody, include,” from Latin in- “into, in, on, upon” (from PIE root *en “in”) + verb from corpus (genitive corporis) “body” (from PIE root *kwrep- “body, form, appearance”). Meaning “to legally form a body politic with perpetual succession and power to act as one person, establish as a legal corporation” is from mid-15c. (A verb corporate was used in this sense from early 15c.) Intransitive sense of “unite with another body so as to become part of it” is from 1590s. Related: Incorporated; incorporating.
COMMENT/S: I quote: “to put (something) into the body or substance of (something else), blend; absorb, eat,“. This underlined section above is ‘substantially’ equivalent in descriptive terms to putting or blending or incorporating a soul/subtle/spirit based life form into something solid/hard (at least compared to something readily described in ‘breath/moisture’ terms . . . hence then the soul spirit form would become ‘substantive’ i.e. it would go from something amorphous/ethereal to something solid/hard i.e. physically ‘touchable’!!!! Strangely, doesn’t “unite into one body” directly imply the merging of more than one body (i.e. two bodies) into one!!! Which coincidentally is ‘exactly’ what you get when you interface the soul/spirit form into any physical animal’s body!!!
Embody (v.): 1540s, in reference to a soul or spirit invested with a physical form; from 1660s of principles, ideas, etc.; from em- (1) “in” + body (n.). Related: Embodied; embodying.: To give a body to (a spirit) (i.e. Incarnate (adj.): late 14c., “embodied in flesh, in human or bodily form” (of souls, spirits, etc.), from Late Latin incarnatus “made flesh,” a frequent word among early Christian writers, past-participle adjective from Latin incarnare “to make flesh” (see incarnation). Of qualities or abstractions, 1530s.)!!!
Other associations/uses of ‘Embody’: to deprive of spirituality, to make concrete and perceptible, to cause to become a body or part of a body: INCORPORATE
Incorporation: In checking various early language definitions, there are 5 definition ‘angles’ given for ‘Incorporation’, below are the ‘3’ that I personally find the most interesting:
“To give substance or material form to; i.e. to ’embody’ /to be combined into one united body; merged”
“To unite (one thing) with something else already in existence.”
“To cause to merge or combine together into a united whole.”
So, once again, we have terms and words used that strongly as well as directly imply the embodiment or merging of a soul/spirit form with a physical body i.e. a spirit form being incarnated into ‘flesh’!!!! In other words it very strongly implies that ‘incorporation’ was originally describing the practice of subtle ‘people/spirit forms’ being interfaced to a physical form resulting in them being ‘incorporated’ into the ‘PHYSICAL’ reality?
In other words for at least ‘SOME’ of those that decided that they wanted to move their entire subtle/spirit population into the physical (which would take a massive amount of EXTREME organisation) and particularly in terms of making this entire set up work seamlessly i.e to automatically select the next available physical ‘vehicle/avatar’ i.e. physical fetus it will be interfaced to be returned (likely yet again) to the earth physical society . . .
Interestingly, the above original/early language descriptions are then replaced with the following:
“To admit as a member to a corporation or similar organization.”
“To cause to form into a legal corporation: incorporate a business.”
Which appear to imply/suggest that the perhaps subtle ‘ORGANISATIONS’ that were originally focused on ‘incorporating’ subtle beings into the physical as part of their physical ’empire/civilisation’ building/program efforts i.e. these original organisations CEO’s, directors and managers and workforce are perhaps now those here that are directing, managing and or working for what have been converted here into entirely ‘VISIBLE’ physical ‘CORPORATIONS’ . . .
The above, descriptions in an overall sense all very strongly imply that a corporation is equivalent to some ‘enterprise’ that is subtle based and which is directly associated with overseeing and or maybe utilising those incarnated into our physical reality/earth world!!!
With respect to later sections above and the massive effort and organisation required to interface an entire subtle population into the physical then perhaps ‘some’ subtle races and or cultures may decide that they want some ‘payback/return’ for all of these efforts/their investments!!!!
With respect to this ‘bizarre’ possibility specifically, here are some interesting as well as disturbing ‘facts’ that I read about on a web site called viewzone:
The Birth Certificate as Representing a Warehouse Receipt/Payment!!!
The original birth or naturalization record for every U.S. Citizen is on file in the official records in Washington, D.C. (you get to keep a copy!) and the property and assets of every living U.S. Citizen is pledged as collateral for the National Debt! Within two weeks and three days each Certificate of Live Birth is to be filed in Washington D.C. Evidence reveals that there is even a Federal Children Department established by the Shepherd/Townsend Act of 1922 under the Department of Commerce that appears to be involved in this process in some way. Every citizen is given a number (the red number on the Birth Certificate) and each live birth is valued at from 650,000 to 750,000 Federal Reserve dollars in collateral from the Fed. This kind of makes you feel a little different when you look at Federal Reserve Chairman, Nancy Yellen, doesn’t it?
OK. Let’s take a pause to look at the Birth Certificates [below to the right]. You will see the red numbers and you will see the fact that it is, in reality, a “Bank Note”, hence then directly implying that you and I are actually then ‘commodities’!!!!
Since the early 1960s, State governments have issued Birth Certificates to “persons” with legal fictional names using “ALL CAPS” names. This is not a lawful record of your physical birth, but rather the acknowledgement of the “birth” of the juristic, all-caps name. It may appear to be your true name, but since no proper name is ever written in all caps (either lawfully or grammatically) it does not identify who you are.
The Birth Certificate is the government’s self-created document of title for its new property — you and me!!!
The state claims an interest in every child within its jurisdiction. The state (via CPS) will, if it deems it necessary, nullify your parental rights and appoint a guardian (trustee) over your children. The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a valuable asset, which if properly trained, can contribute valuable assets provided by its labor for many years. It is presumed by those who have researched this issue, that the child itself is the asset of the trust established by the birth certificate, and the social security number is the numbering or registration of the trust, allowing for the assets of the trust to be tracked.
If this information is true, your child is now owned by the state. Each one of us, including our children, are considered assets of the bankrupt UNITED STATES. We are now designated by this government as “HUMAN RESOURCES” with a new crop born every year.
In a way, it makes us a kind of corporation whose company name is the same as our real name, but written in ALL CAPS. This “corporation” then generates taxes and wealth over its lifetime and in this way repays the collateral that Uncle Sam borrowed from the Federal Reserve.
Remember that “Bond” thing printed on the bottom of the certificate, let’s take a closer look at the word ‘Bond’ (Merriam-Webster Dictionary of Law (1996)).
1a: A usually formal written agreement by which a person undertakes to perform a certain act (as fulfill the obligations of a contract) … with the condition that failure to perform or abstain will obligate the person … to pay a sum of money or will result in the forfeiture of money put up by the person or surety.
1b: One who acts as a surety.
2: An interest-bearing document giving evidence of a debt issued by a government body or corporation that is sometimes secured by a lien on property and is often designed to take care of a particular financial need.”
Banknote: a kind of negotiable instrument, a promissory note made by a bank payable to the bearer on demand, used as money, and in many jurisdictions is legal tender. Along with coins, banknotes make up the cash or bearer forms of all modern money.
Birth certificates are a form of securities called “warehouse receipts.” The items included on a warehouse receipt, as descried at Â§7-202 of the Uniform Commercial Code, the law which governs commercial paper and transactions, which parallel a birth certificate are:
- The location of the warehouse where the goods are stored…(residence)
- The date of issue of the receipt…..(“Date issued”)
- The consecutive number of the receipt…(found on back or front of the certificate, usually in red numbers)
- A description of the goods or of the packages containing them…(name, sex, date of birth, etc.)
- The signature of the warehouseman, which may be made by his authorized agent…(municipal clerk or state registrar’s signature)
Based on the above, then birth certificates appear to at least qualify as “warehouse receipts” under the Uniform Commercial Code. Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th ed. defines:
“A warehouse receipt, which is considered a document of title, may be a negotiable instrument and is often used for financing with inventory as security.”
It is not difficult to see that a state-created Birth Certificate, with an ALL CAPS name is a document evidencing debt the moment it is issued.
Now, once a state has registered a birth document with the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Department notifies the Treasury Department, which takes out a loan from the Federal Reserve. The Treasury uses the loan to purchase a bond (the Fed holds a purchase money security interest in the bond) from the Department of Commerce, which invests the sale proceeds in the stock or bond market. The Treasury Department then issues Treasury securities in the form of Treasury Bonds, Notes, and Bills using the bonds as surety for the new securities.
This cycle is based on the future tax revenues of the legal person whose name appears on the Birth Certificate. This also means that the bankrupt, corporate U.S. can guarantee to the purchasers of their securities the lifetime labour and tax revenues of every citizen of the United States/American with a Birth Certificate as collateral for payment. This device is initiated simply by converting the lawful, true name of the child into a legal, juristic name of a person.
Legally, you are considered to be a slave or indentured servant to the various Federal, State and local governments via your STATE-issued and STATE-created Birth Certificate in the name of your all-caps person.
Birth Certificates are issued so that the issuer can claim exclusive title to the legal person created thereby!!!
HOWEVER!!!! . . . . after having a think about the above for a while . . . then, as this birth certificate is being presented as a warehouse receipt/payment and as your subtle/spirit/soul body must be being looked after as well as being kept safe ‘SOMEWHERE’ i.e. it’ll have to be:
- Kept, safe within some very secure/protected subtle reality/strata storage area/space (i.e. some subtle equivalent to a ‘warehouse’) while . . . in that it’s not a box of cash or coins . . . such that . . .
- It’ll have to be regularly monitored/checked/looked after either by subtle forms/trained personnel and or sophisticated automated monitoring/diagnostic/apply remedies systems and particularly to ensure that it’s health doesn’t depreciate during the time it’s being interfaced to a physical human form during which it’ll be lying in an inert state, unconscious of and hence then unable to respond to it’s subtle surroundings . . . never mind . . .
- All of the research and development necessary with respect to providing the interfacing to the physical vehicle itself . . .
Such that, it seems to me that at least for certain cultures here, that these ‘WAREHOUSE’ STORAGE, MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION/SECURITY costs are being recouped as a human vehicle incarnation, new human birth, have a physical human life tax/charge!!!!
After reading the above you may find the following interesting too:
Prophet: is a person who speaks for God or a deity, or by divine inspiration and or who foretells/predicts the future.
Profit: (in terms of ‘corporations’ and ‘shares’) is about making gains, leverage or an ‘advantage’ by being the best at assessing trends/predicting future outcomes.