"Earth as a Simulation Series I: How the New Age movements spiritual sayings are 'correct' for a COPIED population where everyone is 'accurately' living SOMEONE ELSE's LIFE. How 'Confirmation Bias & Cognitive Dissonance' are the deducible 'Fixed Behaviours' a copied population will present BUT, wont figure out because 'software' defined people can easily be managed."
Main Page Headings List
- Each Person’s Experiences & Understandings are ALL Equally Valid
- Everything is ‘Perfectly’ Unfolding
- Everyone is Living Exactly what is Right and ‘Perfect’ for Themselves
- Why ALL the World is a Stage AND Why we are EACH AN ACTOR ON THAT STAGE
Again, you’d imagine that with the global interest in the possibility that our reality isn’t all it’s cracked up to be AND the fact we’ve had a simulation argument for over a decade that ‘someone’ somewhere would have done the very obvious and actually just written what it would be like to be a simulated copied person living someone’s else’s copied life in a copied environment.
Could there be a good reason why it would be difficult for a Simulated Copied Person to Write About How it would be to be a Simulated Copied Person?
How come no one anywhere else (that I have found) writes describing the STARK reality of how it would be if you were a software generated person AND you were living the life of someone else?
For the earlier ‘Each person is an actor’ page I wrote . . .
“If we are in a simulation then each person will be very accurately living the life of someone else”
What does this actually really MEAN and more importantly what does it imply?
Well, for a simulation project, which I’ve already stressed has to simulate the copied ‘system’ very accurately to be useful then it simply must be simulating the copied people in the simulation very accurately.
So, to maintain the essential accuracy of each person in a simulation, then each simulated person will be deliberately KEPT aligned to the person they are simulating at all costs which means that in a simulation project each person will be emulated to exhibit the same behaviours, the same personality, the same ideas and the same understandings and the same beliefs and the same interactions behaviours as the person they are simulating.
The simulated copied person will also be a member of the same social groups, the same political party and the same work group.
A simulated copied person is even likely to exhibit the same thinking patterns, the same feeling responses AND they will be emulated to make the same ‘significant’ decisions at the same time as the person they are a copy of.
Is it possible that a Simulated Copied Persons Behaviour could be Different to a hypothetical Real Persons Behaviour?
So, if you actually write out what I’ve written above then you begin to become AWARE that ‘IF’ we are living in a simulation as copied, simulated people then we would very likely find ourselves locked into specific behaviours, specific patterns of interaction and we’d be held to specific understandings and beliefs and so on.
I had to write quite a few pages to explain how the new age spiritual would be valid of they were describing a copied reality presenting copied people. It was only in THINKING about and writing in more and more detail then you are automatically end up reaching a point where you start asking yourself . . .
“Would you expect there to be observable differences in the behaviours, attitudes, understandings, beliefs and responses between a simulated copied person in a simulation compared to a real person living in a real reality?”
Would there be differences that would be observable and perhaps even noticed and even (god forbid) measurable that you could deduce would be EXPECTED for simulated copied people?
Perhaps no one was ALLOWED to even consider writing of how it would be to be a copied person living out someone else’s life because ‘IF’ you do write in exacting detail . . . AND . . . you then spend time THINKING about the implications of this then you might just become aware of something that you can deduce would yet again be seriously ‘worrying’ from the simulation designers point of view?
‘IF’ you did spend time THINKING about the implications of people living out someone else’s life and behaviours very accurately then, what might you become aware of?
Have a (possibly) ‘simulated’ think about this before reading the next page . . .
Click the right >> link below for the next page in this series . .